Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
KMID : 1031020180240010001
Quality Improvement in Health Care
2018 Volume.24 No. 1 p.1 ~ p.8
Challenges in Korea Hospital Accreditation: Focused on Post-Accreditation Management System
Kim Ji-Eun

Shin Kyong-A
Shin Min-Kyung
Shin Jae-Joon
Lee Hyun-Hee
Abstract
Objectives: The post-accreditation management system should be systematic in order to ensure that the accredited hospital continues to strive for patient safety and quality improvement during the accreditation period. In this study, we compare the post-accreditation management system in four countries (the U.S., Australia, Japan, and Korea) and provide suggestions for improving the post-accreditation management system in Korea.

Results: All four countries had the post-accreditation management system, and the basic structure of the system in Korea was similar to that of others. However, there were differences in the practical operation processes and the use of the results. In the operation process, Korea's monitoring relies on voluntary reporting by accredited hospitals. In terms of results utilization, analytical feedback to data submitted by the acrredited hospital is not provided in Korea.

Conclusions: It is necessary to establish a continuous monitoring system for post-accreditation changes and provide feedback to accredited hospitals. It is also necessary to perform a survey without advance notice and establish a firm legal basis for monitoring.
KEYWORD
Accreditation, Quality improvement, Program evaluation
FullTexts / Linksout information
Listed journal information
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI)